内控课题

㈠ 开题报告要写各阶段任务，我们研究的课题是财经方面关于内部控制的，从哪个切入点切入比较好 注意，是

你好，同学，你的开题报告老师让你往哪个方向写？
开题报告有什么要求呢
开题报告是需要多少字呢
你可以告诉我具体的排版格式要求，希望可以帮到你，祝开题报告选题通过顺利。

1、研究背景
研究背景即提出问题，阐述研究该课题的原因。研究背景包括理论背景和现实需要。还要综述国内外关于同类课题研究的现状：①人家在研究什么、研究到什么程度？②找出你想研究而别人还没有做的问题。③他人已做过，你认为做得不够（或有缺陷），提出完善的想法或措施。④别人已做过，你重做实验来验证。

2、目的意义
目的意义是指通过该课题研究将解决什么问题（或得到什么结论），而这一问题的解决（或结论的得出）有什么意义。有时将研究背景和目的意义合二为一。

3、成员分工
成员分工应是指课题组成员在研究过程中所担负的具体职责，要人人有事干、个个担责任。组长负责协调、组织。

4、实施计划
实施计划是课题方案的核心部分，它主要包括研究内容、研究方法和时间安排等。研究内容是指可操作的东西，一般包括几个层次：⑴研究方向。⑵子课题（数目和标题）。⑶与研究方案有关的内容，即要通过什么、达到什么等等。研究方法要写明是文献研究还是实验、调查研究？若是调查研究是普调还是抽查？如果是实验研究，要注明有无对照实验和重复实验。实施计划要详细写出每个阶段的时间安排、地点、任务和目标、由谁负责。若外出调查，要列出调查者、调查对象、调查内容、交通工具、调查工具等。如果是实验研究，要写出实验内容、实验地点、器材。实施计划越具体，则越容易操作。

5、可行性论证
可行性论证是指课题研究所需的条件，即研究所需的信息资料、实验器材、研究经费、学生的知识水平和技能及教师的指导能力。另外，还应提出该课题目前已做了哪些工作，还存在哪些困难和问题，在哪些方面需要得到学校和老师帮助等等。

6、预期成果及其表现形式
预期成果一般是论文或调查（实验）报告等形式。成果表达方式是通过文字、图片、实物和多媒体等形式来表现。

㈡ 互联网企业存货内部控制存在的问题及对策论述，求一篇论文的开题报告

不懂可以问，希望你能顺利早日通过选题：

先说下开题报告的内容
1、课题的来源及选题的依据。主要是研究生对其研究方向的历史，现状和发展情况进行分析，着重说明所选课题的经过，该课题在国内外的研究动态，和对开展此课研究工作的设想，同时阐明所选课题的理论意义、实用价值和社会经济效益，以及准备在哪些方面有所进展或突破。
2、对所确定的课题，在理论上和实际上的意义、价值及可能达到的水平，给予充分的阐述，同时要对自己的课题计划、确定的技术路线、实验方案、预期结果等做理论上和技术可行性的论证。
3、课题研究过程，拟采用哪些方法和手段，目前仪器设备和其他各方面条件是否具备。
4、阐述课题研究工作可能遇的困难和问题，以及解决的方法和措施。
5、估算论文工作所需经费，说明经费来源。
再谈下开题报告的要求
1、开题时间：开题报告至迟应于第三学期末完成。凡未按时开题着，可酌情在论文成绩中减1至5分。
2、研究生要进行系统的文献查阅和广泛的调查研究，写出详细的文献综述，并进行现场考察和初步的试验研究，然后写出5000字左右的书面开题报告，并制定出详细的论文工作计划，经导师审阅、修改后进行开题报告。开题前研究生应将有关的参考文献和已做过的作为开题依据的各种理论分析、试验数据，事先印发给参加会议的有关人员。
3、开题报告必须在学院或教研室(研究室)中进行，组成3至5人的开题报告审查小组，并邀请本专业的教师、学生参加，听取多方面的意见。审查小组成员应事先审阅提交的开题报告及有关资料，为开会做好准备。
会议应发扬学术民主，对研究生的开题报告进行严格审核和科学论证。对选题适当、论据充分、措施落实的，应批准论文开题；对尚有不足的，要限期修改补充，并重做开题报告。若再次开题不能通过。则取消研究生学籍，终止培养。
4、开题通过后，应将开题报告与论文工作计划经导师、教研室主任和学院院长签字后交校学位办公室。研究生、导师、学院各存一份开题报告和论文工作计划的复印件，以便定期检查论文工作。
5、开题通过后，一般不得改变研究课题。确有特殊情况需要更改课题者，由导师写出书面报告说明理由，经教研室主任、学院院长、研究生教育学院院长批准后，方可另做开题报告，改换研究课题，更改研究课题后仍不能进行下去的，则对研究生取消学籍，并取消指导教师指导研究生的资格。

㈢ 说明内控的历史和现状，即前人做过哪些研究，取得哪些成果，有哪些问题没有解决，自己有什么新的看法

这是论文答辩呢吧？不用这么说的，只要简述下摘要就可以，答辩时间紧张，没那么多话说的

㈣ 急需与“上市公司内部控制环境问题研究”这课题有关的外国文献2篇！

文献太长，格式编辑也比较复杂，你可以根据我给出的开头内容和reference自己搜索一下。
Internal control
Corporate governance, internal audit and strategic renewal
In the early 1990s, as the result of a series of eventful organisational malpractices in Europe in both the private and public sector, ranging from financial disasters to operational catastrophes, there was mounting criticism of the quality and scope of financial reporting and the effectiveness of independent accounting. This article discusses the background to corporate governance in the UK. It then covers the development of corporate governance in the Central Bank of Iceland and explains how international currents have affected the Bank.
The main elements of internal control are listed and discussed, followed by how internal control and internal audit can be used to stimulate and promote changes and strategic renewal.
The conclusion is that internal control is a very important element of corporate governance. Internal audit adds value to the organisation by assessing the control systems and reporting that assessment to the board and management, which in turn use it as a measure of the “health” of the organisational system.
The audit function thus becomes the enabler of change by providing knowledge about the true state of the organisation and the rate of the change taking place through an assessment of internal control systems.
......
References
Auditing Practices Board, The Audit Agenda, 1994,
http://www.frc.org.uk
Bank for International Settlements, Central Bank Governance,
Managing the Process of Change, Basel, 1996.
Bank for International Settlements, Central Bank Governance,
Performance Efficiency and Cost, Basel, 1996.
Bank for International Settlements, Enhancing Performance and
Improving Efficiency, Basel, 1996.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Enhancing Corporate
Governance for Banking Organisation, September 1999.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Framework for Internal
Control Systems in Banking Organisations, September 1998.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Framework for the
Evaluation of Internal Control Systems, January 1998.
Cadbury Report, Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects
of Corporate Governance, December 1992,
http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/privatesector/cg/docs/
cadbury.pdf
Catsambas, T., Safeguards Assessments and Central Bank
Legislation, 2002, www.imf.org
Chami, R., and C. Fullenkamp, “Trust as a Means of Improving
Corporate Governance and Efficiency”, IMF Working Paper,WP/02/33.
CMA Canada, Accounting Standards and Corporate Governance,
November 2002.
CoCo, “Guidance for Directors – Governance Processes for
Control”, The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, 1995.
CoCo, “Guidance on Control”, The Canadian Institute of
Chartered Accountants, 1995.
COSO, “Internal Control – Integrated Framework”, Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, 1992,
www.aicpa.org
Fry, M., L. Mahadeva and G. Sterne, “Key Issues in the Choice of
Monetary Framework”, Centre for Central Bank Studies, 2000.
Gibbs, J., and P. Keating, “Reengineering Controls”, Internal
Auditor, pp. 46-49, October 1995.
Greenbury Report on Directors’ Remuneration, July 1995,
http://www.ecgi.org/codes/country_documents/uk/greenbury.pdf
Hampel Report, The Report of the Committee on Corporate
Governance (1998),
http://www.ecgi.org/codes/cpuntry_documents/uk/hampel_index.
htm
Higgs Report (Derek Higgs), Review of the role and effectiveness
of non-executive directors, January 2003,
http://www.dti.gov.uk-/cld/non_exec_review/pdfs/higgsreport.pdf
Johnson, G. and K. Scholes, Exploring Corporate strategy, text
and cases, 4th edition, Prentice Hall, 1997, p. 10.
Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton, The Strategy-Focused Organization,
Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 2001.
Kurtzig, J., “Coping with the accounting standards and central
bank transparency”, Central Banking Journal, Vol. XII, No. 2, pp.
76-81, November 2001.
List of Current Corporate Governance Codes,
http://www.combinet.org/goverance/finalver/listof.htm
Markides, C., and H. Singh, “Corporate Restructuring: ASymptom
of Poor Governance or a Solution to Past Managerial Mistakes”,
European Management Journal, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 213-219, June
1997.
McNamee, D., 1995, “Towards a General Theory of Internal
Audit”, Internal Auditing, April, pp. 17-20.
Mendzela, J., “Leadership and management of central banks”,
Central Banking Journal, pp. 59-66, Vol. XIII.2.
Muralidharan, R., and R.D. Hamilton III, “Aligning Multinational
Control Systems”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 352-
361, 1999.
OECD, Principles of Corporate Governance, 1999,
http://www.oecd.org
Research Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
Scotland, Auditing into the Twenty-first Century, The Institute of
Chartered Accountants of Scotland, 1993.
Ridley, J., and A. Chambers, Leading Edge Internal Auditing,
Prentice Hall Europe, 1998.
Rutteman Report, Internal Control and Financial Reporting:
Guidance for Directors of Listed Companies registered in the UK.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales,1994
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, http://www.sarbanes-oxley.com
Simons, R., “Control in the Age of Empowerment”, Harvard
Business Review, pp. 80-88, March-April 1995.
Simons, R., Levers of Control, Harvard Business School Press,
Boston 1994.
Smith Report, Audit Committees: Combined Code Guidance.
Submitted to the Financial Reporting Council in December 2002
and published in January 2003, http://frc.org.uk/publications
Special Report, What the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Means for Banks,
Fall 2002, www.sheshunoff.com
Steinthórsdóttir, L., The Central Bank of Iceland: Towards a
Framework for Internal Audit, University of Edinburgh, dissertation,
Edinburgh, 1998.
The Institute of Internal Auditors – UK and Ireland, A New Agenda
for Corporate Governance Reform, July 2002.
The Institute of Internal Auditors – UK and Ireland, Internal
Control Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code,
September 1999.
The Institute of Internal Auditors, Recommendations for Improving
Corporate Governance, http://www.theiia.org
The Institute of Internal Auditors, Three Routes to Improve
Corporate Governance, http://www.theiia.org
Tongren, J.D., “CoActive control”, Internal Auditor, pp. 42-44,
June 1995.
Turnbull Report, Internal Control Guidance for Directors on the
Combined Code, September 1999,
http://ecgi.org/codes/country_documents/uk/turnbul.pdf